Posted on: May 2, 2020 Posted by: admin Comments: 0


ASTM D – 11, “Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface locations and the arithmetic mean determined, Method C—A composite plastic. ASTM D, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast Appendix C: Additional Considerations when Measuring Surface Profile. ASTM D – 11 Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast Method C—A composite plastic tape is impressed into.

Author: Maujinn Tuzahn
Country: Mozambique
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 28 November 2004
Pages: 197
PDF File Size: 12.3 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.39 Mb
ISBN: 347-5-11972-262-7
Downloads: 65280
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Nern

The base of the instrument rests on the tops of the peaks of the surface pro?

As a result, a major revision to the standard was initiated in and continues today. See Figures 45 and 6. As illustrated by this article, the dedicated leadership, committee member and interlaboratory study participation, and the knowledge and experience of those working in the task groups allows Subcommittee D In response to these and other issues, Subcommittee D Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee,1which you may attend.

ASTM D contains three methods of measuring surface profile depth: It is envisioned that the draft will be published in as a test method, but without precision and bias statements. If surface profile conforms, document process control items. The pattern of surface roughness is replicated by burnishing the tape, effectively pressing the compressible foam into the surface roughness.

Difference in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D Method B vs CKTA University

Standards d417 Measurement of Surface Profile There are currently four primary standards for measurement of surface profile in steel surfaces. Precautions Determining surface profile on flame cut edges Removal of carburization hardening may be required prior to blast cleaning Effect of existing surface profile on newly generated surface profile Existing profile beneath coating may exceed specified profile for maintenance painting.


Revisions to the entire test method are also in process. There are additional techniques suitable for laboratory use not covered by these test methods.

Earl Bowry, Jotun Paints, Inc. While both the depth micrometer and replica tape methods conform to ASTM D, the measurement acquisition principles are quite different. These include the size of the loading fixture, and scoring of the coating based on inherent thickness prior to attachment of the loading fixture.

Industrial Protective Coatings

If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the F Committee on Standards, at the address shown below. For this reason, surface profile should be measured prior to coating application to ensure that it meets that specified. This includes personalizing content and advertising.

The data will reveal the variations in atsm and operators, and will be used to formulate new precision and bias statements. Precision and Bias 8.

He has been employed by KTA for over 27 years. Method B depth micrometer incorporates a special spring-tension micrometer with a 1-inch 2.


While both mehhod depth micrometer and replica tape methods conform to ASTM D, the measurement astm d method c principles are quite different. As a result, there are differences in testing procedures that should be considered when evaluating coatings applied to concrete, versus coatings applied to steel. Coatings specialists may use the method for evaluating the zstm characteristics of an existing coating during a coating condition survey, or in a failure investigation. The average surface profile depth is read from the micrometer dial in mils or micronsafter the micrometer has been corrected for the thickness of the polyester backing material.


Method for the calibration of ISO surface profile comparators and for the determination of surface profile – Stylus instrument procedure Part methd Pull-Off Adhesion of Coatings on Concrete As stated above, the original version of D published astm d method c did not distinguish between testing the pull-off strength of coatings applied to steel versus concrete surfaces.

Differences in Surface Profile Measurements: ASTM D4417- Method B vs. Method C

Further, when data are generated using different types of pull-off testers, it is difficult to compare the tensile adhesion characteristics within a given generic coating category, or to compare the adhesion quality of different coating systems. See Figures 1314 By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies To learn more, click Read More to view our Privacy and Cookies Policy.

With the base of the micrometer resting on the peaks of the surface profile, and the conical pin protruding to a valley of the profile, the distance is read from the gage display in mils or micrometers. The comparator areas are used with or without magni?

Coatings specialists may use the method for evaluating the astm d method c characteristics of an existing coating during a coating condition survey, or in a failure investigation. What is Surface Profile and Why is it Necessary? Report the range of results from all locations as the surface pro?

The user reports the pull-off strength in psi or MPaand the location of the break in the coating system, i. Since corrosion products expand as they migrate beneath a coating film, the coating may disbond, leaving the substrate unprotected.


Leave a Comment